March 27, 2013
Welcome to the “ACUTA Legislative/Regulatory Update,” a
monthly electronic newsletter summarizing Federal regulatory and legislative
developments of interest to information communications technology (ICT)
professionals in higher education. This membership benefit is provided monthly
to all named representatives of Institutional, Corporate Affiliate, Associate
and Emeritus members. This update covers the period from February 8th through
March 8, 2013.
“ACUTA Legislative/Regulatory Update” is based primarily on
information provided to the ACUTA Legislative/Regulatory Affairs Committee by
attorneys Kenneth D. Salomon of Thompson Coburn, LLP and J.G. Harrington of Dow
Lohnes Government Strategies LLC, law firms located in Washington, DC with
extensive ICT and media expertise. A copy of the full text of this Dow Lohnes
update is also available at
http://www.acuta.org/wcm/acuta/pdf/leg_0313d.pdf
**We encourage you to forward this Update to other
interested parties within your institution, such as legal counsel, governmental
relations staff, security officers, and Chief Information Officers.**
Are there additional people on your campus who would benefit
from regularly receiving the monthly Legislative/Regulatory Update and other
ACUTA publications? Member institutions
may now name as many individuals to their membership roster as desired. All new representatives will receive the same
membership benefits enjoyed by our current members, including access to members-only
sections of the ACUTA website; subscriptions to the ACUTA Journal, eNews, and
Legislative/Regulatory Update; and access to the new online ACUTA Community.
To add members to your college or university’s ACUTA roster,
contact the primary voting member for your institution and ask that they
contact Joanie Profitt or Amy Burton.
Both Joanie and Amy can also be reached at the ACUTA office, (859)
278-3338, and can assist with any changes to membership rosters.
Regulatory and Policy Sessions at the 2013 ACUTA Annual
Conference
Be an invaluable resource to your institution and keep up
with the rapidly changing legislative/regulatory issues that will directly
affect your campus at the ACUTA Annual Conference, April 14 – 17 in San Diego.
The advice and information you can gain from these sessions would be an
excellent ROI on your conference attendance. Some of the highlights are shown
below, but please note that additional regulatory sessions are under
consideration:
Congressional Developments Impacting Higher Ed Technology
Educational breakout
· Ken Salomon
(Partner – Thompson Coburn LLP) provides government relations and public policy
representation to clients, including telecommunications, broadband, commercial
and public broadcasting, privacy, higher education and distributed learning.
Ken previously was a Partner with DowLohnes, LLC, was Deputy Chief Counsel of
the National Telecommunications and Information Administration,and he held
several legal positions at the FCC.
ACUTA's legal and legislative counsel will brief members on
telecom issues that are being considered by Congress. These might include
licensing to make the 700 MHz broadband network fully interoperable, spectrum
reallocation, Congressional efforts to reform FCC processes, wireless taxes,
and Internet piracy. The presenter will also touch upon issues that interest
other higher education and technology associations.
Regulatory Developments Impacting Higher Ed Technology
Educational breakout
· J.G.
Harrington (Partner - Dow Lohnes PLLC) counsels the law firm's telephone,
mobile communications, cable television, broadband and new technologies clients
on federal and state regulatory issues and works with other clients to address
issues that arise in their interactions with service providers and regulators.
ACUTA's legal and legislative counsel will brief members on
telecom issues that are being considered by the FCC and other regulatory
agencies. These might include net neutrality, regulation of VoIP, unauthorized
charges, cramming, carrier mergers/acquisitions, the national broadband plan,
Universal Service Fund and Intercarrier Compensation Rules, bill shock
guidelines, FERPA, and Next Generation E911
CONGRESS
Congressional activity accelerated in February, focused in
part on the confirmation process of several of President Obama’s cabinet
nominees. Legislative activity picked up
as well on several fronts, notably immigration reform, gun control, and
reactions of Democrats and Republicans to the President’s February 12 Executive
Order for “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/executive-order-improving-critical-infrastructure-cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity
· The focus on cybersecurity increased in
Washington, not only in reaction to the Executive Order, but also in the face
of several reports of Chinese government coordinated cyber-attacks on numerous
US companies. The President told
Congress in his February 12 State of the Union address “America must . . . face
the rapidly growing threat from cyber-attacks.”
Since the last report, the White House has called on Congress to pass
legislation to address areas beyond the President’s existing authority and said
it will send Congress priorities for legislation. These are expected to include incentives for
businesses that adopt voluntary standards and liability protections for those
sharing information. However, the two
parties remain split over whether the federal government should set critical
infrastructure cybersecurity standards.
This divide scuttled attempts to pass a bill at the end of 2012.
· The chair of
the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. McCaul (R-TX) said on February 13
that a cybersecurity bill was one of his top legislative priorities and
followed up by introducing the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2013 (H.R. 756)
on February 15. The bill is designed to
advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards.
· On February
17, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rogers (R-MI) said that the Executive
Order may make passage of legislation easier: “The executive order takes
pressure off the Senate and will allow us to get agreement on a voluntary
information sharing bill that will solve 90 percent of the most sophisticated
cyber threats that we face. The executive
order tones down the political rhetoric that was caught up in election year
politics.” Rogers and the Committee
Ranking Democrat, Rep. Ruppersberger (D-MD) introduced a bill on February 13
that would protect companies that share information on cyber threats. Their bill passed the House in April 2012 but
died in the Senate. On March 1, Chairman
Rogers said that he plans to complete talks with the White House and privacy
advocates by April and move to a markup.
· The Senate
Commerce and Homeland Security and Governmental Reform Committees held a March
7 joint hearing on “The Cybersecurity Partnership Between the Private Sector
and Our Government: Protecting our National and Economic Security.” Chairman Rockefeller (D-WV) of the Commerce Committee
said “We simply cannot afford to wait
any longer to adequately protect ourselves.
This hearing will provide valuable insight into the threats we face and
the defenses we need to implement.”
Chairman Carper (D-DE) of the HSAGR Committee added that “While the
President's Executive Order on cyber security was an important step, bipartisan
legislation is still critically necessary to address this serious security
threat.” Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Napolitano and National Institutes for Standards and Technology
(NIST) Director Gallagher testified. The
GOP v. Democratic divisions that prevented passage of legislation (i.e., the
role of the federal government in protecting mostly private owned networks,
liability, etc.) last year resurfaced at the hearing notwithstanding the fact
that Senators of both parties embraced the severity of new foreign
threats. Nevertheless, Chairmen Carper
and Rockefeller predicted that legislation will pass in 2013.
· NIST on
February 26 issued a request for information to survey existing industry cyber
practices and solicit industry feedback (https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/02/26/2013-04413/developing-a-framework-to-improve-critical-infrastructure-cybersecurity). NIST is charged under the Order with
establishing voluntary critical infrastructure cybersecurity standards.
· The House
Judiciary, Armed Services and Homeland Security Committees have scheduled
cybersecurity hearings for March 14. The
House Science Committee will also markup two cyber-related bills that day.
Content Protection
The chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America,
former Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut, in a February 15 speech
(http://www.mpaa.org/Resources/dbd96563-f4e3-409e-a644-2c11546582d3.pdf) said
that protecting both free speech and intellectual property content is required
for a greater digital future.
* * *You can watch more content than ever, through more
channels, and the quality of the movies and TV shows is outstanding.
This is why it’s so crucial that we protect this content
from theft. Because consumers deserve to
enjoy first-generation versions of their favorite films—not secondhand, pirated
films-of-films shot and recorded inside a movie theatre on a mobile phone.
We must strike a balance between the desire for a free and
open internet and the protection of intellectual property. The future cannot be about choosing one over
the other—between protecting free speech OR protecting intellectual property—it
must be about protecting both.
We can and must have an Internet that works for everyone,
and we can and must have protection for the creative industry’s genius that
intellectual property represents.
There should be no confusion. For the more than two million
Americans whose jobs depend on the motion picture and television industry “free
and open” cannot be synonymous with “working for free.”
To protect IP, and the openness and freedom of the Internet,
we must together innovate our way through these challenges. Fortunately,
Silicon Valley and Hollywood are making some progress on this front.
This is somewhat of a softening of MPAA’s position last year
when it tried to push the Stop Online Piracy and Protect Intellectual Property
Acts through Congress. That overly
aggressive protection legislative stimulated a coordinated service blackout by
about 7,000 web sites, led by Wikipedia.
The blackout generated tremendous news coverage and user opposition to
the legislation. The bills were quickly
pulled in the face of massive emails and calls to Members of Congress in
opposition. However, the drive against
“piracy” continues. The House co-chairs
of the Congressional International Anti-Piracy Caucus, House Judiciary
Committee Chairman Goodlatte (R-VA) and Rep. Schiff (D-CA), sent a letter in
mid-February to Members of the House encouraging them to join the Caucus and
warning that many sectors of the economy are at risk due to “large-scale
illegal trafficking” of “copyrighted works such as first-run movies and books.”
Internet Radio
Fairness Act
The head of the Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA) attacked the expected reintroduction of the Internet Radio Fairness Act
and Pandora’s efforts to change the standard royalty rate during a March 6
appearance at Duke University. He said
the bill was a “crippling blow for musicians.”
Social Network
Passwords
As reported in last month’s report, Reps. Engel (D-NY),
Schakowsky (D-IL), Grimm (R-NY), Ellison (D-MN), Tonko (D-NY) and Pingree
(D-ME) introduced the Social Networking Online Protection Act or SNOPA. On February 18, Senator Blumenthal (D-CT)
said that he intended to reintroduce the Password Protection Act. This measure would bar employers from
demanding access information, including passwords, to the online accounts of
employees and job applicants. Blumenthal
said that he would work with the House sponsors to “make sure that we are
literally on the same page in terms of what we’re doing.” While Blumenthal acknowledged that these
bills went nowhere last Congress, he said that “The growing number of state
proposals is one sign of a pressing need for federal measures that provide a
standard. The business community would rather have a uniform national approach
than a crazy quilt of different laws in different states, especially when it comes
to employment by national employers.”
Do Not Track
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Rockefeller on February
28 reintroduced his bill from the last
Congress to prohibit companies from gathering personal information from
Internet users if they explicitly opted out of collection. The Do-Not-Track Act
of 2013 (S. 418) would only allow data to be collected if it were used to help
the site function.
Cellphone Unlocking
There is growing bipartisan momentum to legalize cellphone
unlocking to enable owners of devices to switch it to the wireless carrier of
their choice. The Librarian of Congress
ruled last year that the “No person shall circumvent a technological measure
that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title”
provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) required that
customers must obtain their carriers’ permission to unlock their phones, even
if their contracts have expired. The
White House endorsed unlocking in early March after receiving more than 114,000
online petition signatures (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/its-time-legalize-cell-phone-unlocking).
On March 4, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Leahy (D-VT) said that he wants
to pass enabling legislation. On March
5, Senator Wyden (D-OR) introduced the Wireless Device Independence Act of
2013(S. 467) that would amend the DMCA to specify that consumers may unlock
their devices. Senators Klobuchar
(D-MN), who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy
Consumer Rights, Lee (R-UT) and Blumenthal (D-CT) took a different approach in
their March 7 bill (S. 481). It gives
the FCC authority to require cellphone companies to allow unlocking. Others
supporting unlocking include Senator Wyden (D-OR) and Reps. Eshoo (D-CA), Issa (R-CA),
Chaffetz (R-UT) and Polis (D-CO), and FCC Commissioner Rosenworcel called the
White House statement “Terrific.”
Spectrum
The Senate Commerce Committee is planning a closed door
session to look at the use of spectrum by the military, intelligence, and
federal law enforcement agencies.
Chairman Rockefeller said in mid-February that “We need spectrum. We need it for the D-block – we need it for
all kinds of purposes. There are some
agencies that may have more spectrum than they need.”
Satellite Television
Extension and Localism Act
In March 5 speech to the National Association of
Broadcasters, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Orrin
Hatch (R-UT), said that while a “clean reauthorization of the Satellite Television Extension and
Localism Act (STELA) would be best, he would not be surprised if the bill is
expanded. Hatch noted that cable
companies would like an expansion of the compulsory copyright license that
permits satellite operators to import distant TV station signals that would
enable cable operators to continue carriage of a broadcast signal during
retransmission consent impasses.
Additionally, satellite operators would like to be able to import
less-than-distant signals in markets that straddle states. Also speaking at the NAB, Commissioner
Rosenworcel echoed Sen. Hatch, saying that STELA could become a vehicle for a
revision of the Telecommunications Act.
Hearing on Broadband
Stimulus Grants
The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications
and Technology held a February 27 oversight hearing on the $7 billion in
broadband grants and loans made by NTIA and the Rural Utilities Service under
the America Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Subcommittee Chairman Walden (R-OR) and
Committee GOP staff clearly focused the hearing on fraud, waste and abuse in
the programs. Republicans honed in on
allegations that some of the awards resulted in overbuilding in areas already
served by broadband and on improper purchasing practices by an NTIA grantee in
West Virginia that received a $126.3 million award. The Department of Commerce Inspector General
and the West Virginia Legislative Auditor found that the grantee allegedly used
an illegal, non-open bidding process to purchase Cisco routers for its
project. They also questioned whether
less expensive routers might have sufficed.
Another project highlighted was alleged overbuilding by NTIA grantee
EAGLE-Net in Colorado. Chairman Walden
said that "Promoting broadband is a laudable goal. But there are many laudable goals. From what we know now, the government has
spent millions on equipment it did not need and on stringing fiber to areas
that already had it." Rep. Barton
(R-TX) questioned whether the broadband programs were needed in the first
place: “When 220 million Americans have access to broadband in their homes and
on their iPhones and iPads, 96 percent of the country has access in some shape,
form or fashion, it really calls into question why we need the program. It’s not that it’s a bad program. It’s not
that it’s even a wasteful program. But
is it a necessary program when this weekend we’re going to have sequestration
kick in and it’s going to cut $85 billion and if you believe President Obama
the sky is falling?”
NTIA
Administrator Strickling told the Subcommittee that as of the end of 2012:
· 86,000 miles
of broadband infrastructure was deployed or upgraded;
· almost
12,000 community anchor institutions (schools, hospitals, libraries, community
centers, public safety providers, etc.) were connected to high speed broadband
Internet service;
· 600
interconnection agreements were entered to leverage or interconnect these
networks;
· 40,000
workstations in public computer centers were installed in 20% of the nation’s
libraries;
· 9.9 million
hours of technology training was provided to 2.8 million users;
· 520,000 new
broadband subscribers were generated; and
· 4,000 new
jobs were funded each quarter for the past five quarters and enabled those who
took digital literacy training to
secure “thousands more.”
The RUS Administrator said that of $2.33 billion in grants
and $1.9 billion in loans, 297 were for broadband infrastructure, four for
satellite broadband service support, and 19 for technical assistance, mostly
for tribal communities. He said that 38
grants were terminated, and $266 million returned to the Treasury, all 19
technical assistance awards had been disbursed, 86% of the satellite broadband
program was disbursed, and 116 projects of the broadband infrastructure
projects have been completed and are partially operational.
Advancing America's
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act
Rep. Lummis (R-WY) introduced the Advancing America's
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act (H.R. 967)
on March 5. The bill would amend the
High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 to support information technology and
networking research. Section 105 would
create a University/Industry Task Force
under the authority of the Director of the National Coordination Office
“to explore mechanisms for carrying out collaborative research and development
activities for cyber-physical systems, including the related technologies
required to enable these systems, through a consortium or other appropriate
entity with participants from institutions of higher education, Federal
laboratories, and industry.” The Task
Force would
(1) develop options for a collaborative model and an
organizational structure for such entity under which the joint research and
development activities could be planned, managed, and conducted effectively,
including mechanisms for the allocation of resources among the participants in
such entity for support of such activities;
(2) propose a process for developing a research and
development agenda for such entity, including guidelines to ensure an
appropriate scope of work focused on nationally significant challenges and
requiring collaboration and to ensure the development of related scientific and
technological milestones;
(3) define the roles and responsibilities for the
participants from institutions of higher education, Federal laboratories, and
industry in such entity;
(4) propose guidelines for assigning intellectual property
rights and for the transfer of research results to the private sector; and
(5) make recommendations for how such entity could be funded
from Federal, State, and non-governmental sources.
The Task Force’s findings and recommendations are to be sent
to Congress within a year of enactment.
FCC Chairman
It remains unclear whether, but more likely when, FCC
Chairman Genachowski will leave the Commission.
However, names of possible successors are circulating. One of the more recent names mentioned (on
February 22) is Tom Wheeler, notwithstanding pressure on the President to name
the Commission’s first female chair.
Wheeler is well-respected in the communications industry where he served
as head of the National Cable Television Association and CTIA-The Wireless
Association. He was a major Obama
fundraiser in 2008 and led the 2009 Obama-Biden Transition Team’s Agency Review
Working Group focused on science, technology, space and arts agencies.
The leading female contenders are sitting Democratic
Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel.
Other female candidates are said to be Susan Crawford, a former Special
Assistant to the President for Science, Technology, and Innovation, Karen
Kornbluh, Ambassador to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, and Catherine Sandoval, a professor Santa Clara University Law
School and a California Public Utilities Commission member.
Other names in circulation include Larry Strickling of NTIA;
Blair Levin, architect of the National Broadband Plan; Scott Harris, General
Counsel and Senior VP of NeuStar, Inc.; Jason Furman, Assistant to the
President for Economic Policy and the Principal Deputy Director of the National
Economic Council; Thomas Power, Deputy Chief Technology Officer in the White
House Office of Science and Technology Policy; and Steven VanRoekel, the U.S.
CIO.
The Senate Commerce Committee will hold a March 12 FCC
oversight hearing with all five Commissioners testifying. Issues expected to be raised by the Senators
are the E-rate program, FirstNet, and consumer rights in the wireless sector.
NATIONAL BROADBAND
PLAN
The following are the most significant actions to implement
the National Broadband Plan since our last report:
· On February
12, the FCC announced that its reforms of the Lifeline program, which provides
assistance to low income households for voice telephone service, are “on track”
to save an additional $400 million by the end of 2013 and $2 billion by the end
of 2014. The FCC press release is
available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0212/DOC-318892A1.pdf.
· On February
15, the FCC released its third report on broadband speeds. The report found, among other things, that
service providers are delivering speed levels more consistently, with speed
levels at peak demand periods of 97 percent of advertised speeds; that speed
levels are increasing, with an average speed of 15.6 Mbps, up from 14.3 Mbps in
the last report; and that speeds for satellite-delivered services have
increased significantly. The press
release on the report is available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0215/DOC-318964A1.pdf
and the full report is available at
http://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america.
· On February
20, the FCC adopted a notice of proposed rulemaking that proposes rules to open
up 195 MHz of spectrum in the 5 GHz band for new Wi-Fi devices. The FCC has suggested that the new spectrum
could support speeds up to 1 Gbps. Comments
and reply comments on the proposed rules are due 45 and 75 days, respectively
after notice is published in the Federal Register. The press release on the notice is available
at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0220/DOC-319025A1.pdf
and the notice itself is available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0220/FCC-13-22A1.pdf.
FCC
FCC Adopts Order on
Wireless Signal Boosters
On February 20, the FCC adopted its first order addressing
the permissibility of wireless boosters.
Under the order, new technical standards will apply to consumer
boosters. Although use of boosters will
require consent from the user’s wireless provider, all of the major wireless
providers have agreed to consent to the use of any boosters that meet the technical
standards. The order also adopts new
rules for “industrial boosters,” which can be deployed only with the
involvement of wireless providers and for boosters used with private radio
systems. Existing boosters are not
grandfathered under the new rules, but can be operated with permission from the
customer’s wireless provider. The press
release on the order is available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0220/DOC-319023A1.pdf
and the order itself is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0220/FCC-13-21A1.pdf.
FCC Holds Second
Hearing on Resiliency and Reliability
The FCC held its second field hearing on resiliency and
reliability on February 28 at the NASA Ames Research Center in southern
California. The hearing addressed
potential network technologies and power solutions to improve resiliency; and
the potential to use apps and social media to enhance communications. The full agenda is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0226/DA-13-289A1.pdf,
and the Commissioners’ statements at the hearing are available at
http://www.fcc.gov/events/second-national-hearing-network-resilience-and-reliability,
which also will have video of the hearing in the near future.
FCC Reports to
Congress on Next Generation 911
On February 27, the FCC released a report to Congress on the
appropriate legal and regulatory framework for next generation 911
services. The report, required by the
Next Generation 9-1-1 Advancement Act of 2012, makes the following
recommendations: (1) Congress should
create incentives for states to become early adopters of next generation 911;
(2) State-level next generation 911 rules should be encouraged, but there
should be a national-level backstop in case states do not adopt rules; (3)
Congress should promote national standards; (4) Congress should promote
development of location technologies for all end user devices; (5) Congress
should support establishment of national security and routing databases; and
(6) Congress should act to assist in the elimination of legacy 911 regulation
at the state level while providing incentives for next generation 911
deployment. The report is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0227/DOC-319165A1.pdf.
FCC Releases Report
on Wireless Spectrum
On February 26, the FCC released a report comparing the availability
of wireless spectrum in the U.S. to spectrum availability in other
countries. In general, the report
indicates that the U.S. has available spectrum resources that are comparable to
(or more expansive than) those in other countries, but that there are
significant efforts to increase spectrum availability around the world. The report is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0227/DOC-318485A1.pdf.
Other Regulatory
Issues
FCC Recharters Communications Security Council
On February 11, the FCC announced that it was rechartering
the Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council, which
has provided advice to the FCC on these issues.
In connection with the rechartering of the council, the FCC also
announced that it is seeking nominations for the committee, which are due on
March 20. The public notice making these
announcements is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0212/DA-13-173A1.pdf.
First Meeting of Technology Transitions Policy Task Force
Announced
On February 12, the FCC announced that the first workshop of
the Technology Transitions Policy Task Force will be held on March 18. The task force will be making
“recommendations to modernize” the FCC’s policies, principally in connection
with telecommunications services. At the
workshop, the task force will be reviewing information on “the evolution in
network protocols, including from TDM to IP; the replacement of copper networks
with fiber; and the shift from wireline services toward greater use of wireless
services.” The workshop will be streamed
live. The announcement of the workshop
is available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0212/DA-13-192A1.pdf
and the streamed video will be available at http://www.fcc.gov/live.
Office of Engineering and Technology Authorizes White-Spaces
Databases
On March 1, the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology
announced that it had authorized approved white-space database systems to
provide data to unlicensed devices operating in the television white spaces
nationwide. Database operation
previously had been limited to some states on the East Coast. The public notice also noted that venues that
use unlicensed wireless microphones can register with the databases to avoid
interference from white spaces devices.
The public notice is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0304/DA-13-322A1.pdf.
Workshop on Gigabit
Community Networks Set
On March 4, the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau announced
that it would be holding a workshop on gigabit community broadband networks, to
be held on March 27 at the FCC’s offices.
The workshop is a follow-up to Chairman Genachowski’s January
announcement of a Gigabit City Challenge, described in last month’s
report. Details of the agenda will be
released closer to the date of the workshop.
The press release announcing the workshop is available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0304/DA-13-322A1.pdf.
Genachowski Statement on Mobile Phone Unlocking
Reacting to the decision by the Librarian of Congress that
mobile phone unlocking no longer would be exempt from sanctions under the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (discussed above), FCC Chairman Genachowski
issued a statement on March 4. In the
statement, he said that the decision “raises serious competition and innovation
concerns,” and that the FCC is “examining” the issue to determine whether the
FCC, wireless providers or others should act to address the decision. He also suggested that Congressional action
might be appropriate. The statement is
available at
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0304/DOC-319250A1.pdf.
FCC Issues High-Cost
Universal Service Reconsideration Order
On February 27, the FCC released an order addressing
petitions for reconsideration of its 2011 high-cost universal service reform
decision. This order focused on support
provided to small carriers that set their rates using the rate of return
methodology. While it made some minor
changes to the rules, it left the most important reforms, including limits on
recovery of administrative costs and the overall $250 per line per month limit
on support, in place. The order is
available at http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0307/FCC-13-16A1.pdf.