Thursday, September 20, 2012

Ethernet Internet

Work Instead of Waiting with Ethernet Internet Access that Gives the Same Upload and Download Speed, Up to 1 Gbps, for Lightning-Fast File Transfer.

Ethernet Internet keeps you working, not waiting. Ethernet Internet provides your business with speeds up to 1Gbps and the same speed for uploads and downloads to move large data quickly. Plus, you receive the same reliability and performance of a traditional T1.

And, unlike cable Internet's shared access lines, Ethernet Internet is a dedicated connection ensuring Internet traffic jams are bypassed. For businesses that depend on Internet during peak usage hours, cable Internet is a risk because your business is always competing for bandwidth with other cable customers.

Use Ethernet Internet to:

Securely transfer large data files, utilize hosted applications, and take advantage of flexibility to add speed at any time.

Reduce costs of equipment setup and operation with a simple plug and play setup.

Reduce time spent waiting for large files to upload with synchronous upload and download speeds.

Get greater bandwidth at a lower cost per megabit than T1, Frame Relay or Private Line

Ethernet Internet Features:

Speeds up to 1Gbps

Equally fast downloads and uploads

Dedicated connection provides better reliability and more consistent performance than a shared cable connection

Tremendous bandwidth provides access for small, medium and large businesses
Ethernet speeds are consistent throughout the day so you always get your peak speed, 24/7

Guaranteed Network Reliability — service level agreement guarantees 99.99% uptime

Ethernet Internet helps your business tap into the unlimited potential of the Internet, ultimately allowing you to reduce your costs and increase your business efficiencies.

Audio collaboration


Voice communication is one of the simplest and most effective means to exchange information and ideas. With our voice collaboration services, you can share your ideas with 3, 30, 300, 3000 or more participants. Enhance the productivity of worldwide collaboration any time of day or night.

Our audio collaboration services offer a full range of configuration options to meet the teleconferencing needs of almost any sized organization, large or small. From simple ad-hoc bridges for on-demand conferencing to fully managed conference call services, operator-assisted event conferences, we have the right audio collaboration solutions for you.

Audio Collaboration Services Benefits

Quick-connect applications for your mobile device, desktop and calendar allow you to schedule, join and manage your meetings, regardless of your access platform.  
Optional suite of web and video services – Share documents, data, presentations, desktop or streaming video in real time for added meeting productivity.
Knowledgeable service and support – A conference operator assistant is available 24x7.
Global toll-free numbers enable worldwide reach, local convenience and unmatched reliability.
Redundant systems offer disaster protection and the ultimate in reliability.
Full-service calling – You can get the convenience of operator monitoring, Q&A session management, a list of conference participants, and roll-call functionality (available with full service events only).
Conference Portal – Manage your account options and user information, and leverage tutorials to support improved conference performance.
Intelligent Routing – We dynamically route your conferences to in-region platforms or to the most available resources to fit your feature set.

lkconsulting.net

262-290-5210

Ohio advocate groups rail against plans to disconnect guaranteed landline phone service Read more: Ohio advocate groups rail against plans to disconnect guaranteed landline phone service

FierceTelecom
By Jim Barthold

 Consumer advocate groups descended on Columbus, Ohio Wednesday to make it clear to state legislators that they don't like a proposal to end guaranteed landline telephone service in the state.
The Ohio Senate approved the legislation 30-3 in February and the debate moved on to the House, where it will likely resume after the November elections. The state is proposing legislation, backed by the telecommunications industry, that says it is a "waste of resources to continue maintaining archaic landline equipment at a time when more and more consumers are walking away from the service," astory on NBC4i.com said.
The coalition of consumer advocate groups disagreed, pointing out that not everyone can get mobile service everywhere in the state.

"Thirty-five years ago that was not a problem because all we had was two little copper wires coming into the house and that was our phone service and it worked," said Mike Turner, executive director of the United Seniors of Athens. "And without those two little copper wires coming into my house I would have no communication with the outside world and there'd be nothing I could do about it."

According to a survey conducted and released by the Citizens to Protect Ohio Consumer Federation, there is "widespread public opposition to the proposal."

"Common sense dictates that ending the guarantee of basic landline service is bad for consumers," said the group's president and David Kelley, the group's president who also happens to be the Adams County prosecutor. "The polling results showing that nearly 75 percent of Ohioans oppose the law show that Ohioans well know good policy from bad policy."

According to Jack Kleinhentz, a representative for a phone company coalition called Technology for Ohio's Tomorrow, investing in existing landline equipment would mean cutting back on investments in broadband.
"The important thing is… where we are going to put the investment and how to maintain it," Kleinhentz said.


How Private Cloud helps your network


Secure Private Cloud for Networking

Your business may be considering a move to the “cloud” for some applications and communications services. Interest in cloud computing is driven by increasing expectations for always-on, geographically dispersed businesses—accompanied by decreasing budgets and staff availability to manage an in-house network.
But what does the cloud really mean to your network design and how you deliver voice and data services to users? What factors should you consider when evaluating how to use cloud-based applications with public and private network services? How do you create the best deployment of a private or hybrid public/private network for secure cloud computing?
Before moving to a cloud, it is important to identify the activities and applications that the cloud network will need to support. For example, do you want to:
- Access external storage and computing resources or cloud-based applications?
- Perform transactions—such as working with financial databases or verifying identities?
- Support real-time monitoring, collaboration, and instant communication?

The Drawbacks of a Public (Internet-Only) Network

After identifying your cloud computing goals, consider the type of network you want. Although a public network that uses the
Internet to transport all traffic may seem like an attractive choice, it involves significant trade-offs for performance and security.
Applications may not perform properly and/or bandwidth may not be available for mission-critical applications. Your network may
suffer latency, jitter, and packet loss.
For performance, a public network provider using the Internet can only deliver a “best effort” priority level that applies to all traffic. This limitation exists because all Internet traffic is vulnerable to moment-by-moment congestion levels and routing path availability, which can render your applications unusable. Applications on a public network may create user frustration if the network delivers a slow response or when access is blocked because of Internet problems.
Security is another critical concern in using public networks. Private Networks, MPLS in particular, are less susceptible to Denial of Service (DOS) and other attacks than networks that utilize the public network for site-to-site communications.
Additionally, although anti-virus, intrusion detection, and intrusion prevention services may be available, these services are usually applied only at the customer premises, which may be too late for protecting data and applications from unauthorized access, data theft, and disruption.
Together, the risk of network latency and security threats in a public network may outweigh the advantages of moving to a cloud environment in order to reduce computing costs and IT staff levels.

The Advantages of Private MPLS-based Network for Cloud Computing

In contrast to the limitations of a public network, private MPLS-based network offers many advantages for cloud computing. MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) has been the foundation technology for communications and creating private networks consisting of two or more locations. By design, MPLS creates a fully meshed network topology with multiple paths between any two or more sites. It automatically forwards your traffic via the optimal path, ensuring that packets—which carry data, voice calls, or video streams—are delivered quickly without bottlenecks or single points of failure. This efficiency makes MPLS ideal for supporting performance-sensitive applications such as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and videoconferencing, as well as financial and enterprise resource planning (ERP) transactions. Many large enterprises, healthcare organizations, government agencies, and other companies choose MPLS because of the advantages it offers for the safety and security of their networks and data.
MPLS is both a secure and “self-healing” network that maintains multiple routes to cloud-based applications. If a private network becomes congested, the network can automatically reroute packets using another available path. In addition, Class of Service (CoS) definitions can prescribe the priority levels for certain types of packets (e.g., voice, video, and point-of-sale) throughout a private network to ensure your applications have the network resources available to function properly.

Additional security measures can protect your data if you include Internet access in your private network design. A gateway security service will check the data packets before they enter your private network looking for intrusions, viruses, and related threats. A firewall can allow certain types of network traffic to access cloud-based applications, or it can deny external access.
A Carrier’s network plays a role your business’ cloud computing by connecting your business locations to each other and the Internet. This role means the capabilities the carriers network can greatly impact the performance, reliability, and security of your cloud-based applications.
The carrier must have an all-optical MPLS core network that offers a strong foundation for a private network because the MPLS network is engineered to maximize application performance. Redundant OCx links and a fault-tolerant point-of-presence (POP) architecture maximize network uptime and reliability. In addition, the carrier must use state-of-the-art MPLS routing technology to deliver your data with exceptionally low latency and packet loss.


High Performance Traffic Shaping and Class of Service

A critical factor for the success of cloud computing is delivering high performance levels for each traffic type and application carried on the network. MPLS networks use Class of Service (CoS) tagging or labeling to shape voice, video, and data traffic, then maintain that priority across the network. This prioritization delivers the quality of service that is an important requirement for a provider’s network.
CoS rules ensure that voice calls and videos have optimal sound and playback quality. Additionally, IT managers can control bandwidth costs and network performance by using CoS to prioritize voice traffic ahead of data applications and real-time video conference streams ahead of stored video downloads. A provider extends service classes to your sites using CoS-capable equipment to mark, queue, and prioritize traffic as it travels from the site to the MPLS network. This traffic marking and prioritization ensures consistent circuit performance for important applications. The provider-edge routers also prioritize and queue these traffic flows across the MPLS network and in the return direction from the network to the site.
It is important to note that any traffic destined for the Internet cannot be prioritized once it leaves the carriers network because they have no control over the Internet routers. (A carrier may have its own Internet routers but cannot not control the Internet routers owned or managed by other carriers.) However, critical applications that access the Internet can still benefit from priority handling within some networks while en route to the Internet.
Although most service providers support some form of CoS prioritization in their MPLS networks, not all of these offerings are alike. Some service providers support only a few options for traffic prioritization CoS definitions, covering the broad categories of voice, video, and data. The most common definitions are:
- Real-time: Voice services and customer VoIP and video traffic
- Critical: Mission-critical data—such as financial transactions and credit card data transmission
- Business: Enterprise applications—such as SAP, Oracle, or video surveillance traffic
- Data: Low-priority traffic—such as Internet browsing, file transfers, and stored video downloads
The ability to create multiple CoS definitions helps you better manage traffic in a private cloud by:
- Prioritizing business-critical applications
- Controlling bandwidth allocations and avoiding the need to over-provision or dedicate circuits
- Promoting consistent, interruption-free network performance
- Preventing critical applications from failing or impacting the user experience due to network congestion

Protect Your Network with Managed Security Services

To protect your cloud-computing solution, carriers offer powerful, cost-effective, and fully managed security solutions that are compliant with key industry standards, such as PCI and HIPAA. These services deliver a multilayer security approach that provides holistic protection from individual and blended threats, as well as coordinated security alerting, blogging, and reporting.
Carriers offer cloud-based network edge protection, as well as site-level solutions to protect your assets from external and internal threats. Security solution components—which are managed and maintained by the provider—typically include managed firewalls; intrusion prevention systems; antivirus, anti-spyware, and anti-spam software; and Web and content/URL filtering tools.
When delivered via a single platform, these components are classified as Unified Threat Management (UTM). When selecting a security solution, it is important to understand where the protection is being applied. In all scenarios, defense-in-depth is a best security practice.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

BYOD trend fuels MDM demand



By Fred Donovan


An area of enterprise mobile IT that is often overlooked, particularly in news coverage, is the machine-to-machine wireless networking segment. It certainly isn't as sexy as the latest iPhone, but it is an important segment nonetheless.

As the latest survey by TechNavio shows, the M2M market wireless networking market is healthy and predicted to get healthier, growing at close to 30 percent per year. TechNavio said that the market is being fueled by the increasing number of mobile devices and better network coverage.
Some of the biggest names in wireless services provide M2M, including AT&T (NYSE: T), T-Mobile and Verizon (NYSE: VZ).

Recognizing its potential, the Federal Communications Commission has identified M2M as one of the key focuses of its Technology Advisory Council for 2012. It set up a TAC M2M to identify barriers to M2M growth and develop recommendations to break down these barriers.
In a speech last year, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said we are "at the dawn of a takeoff in machine-to-machine mobile communications ... Clearly, the opportunities of mobile broadband are enormous. And clearly we must seize them."

M2M technology runs major portions of U.S. critical infrastructure, including the electricity, oil and gas, transportation and medical device sectors. So, its development as well as its security, is a vital U.S. interest. - Fred

lkconsulting.net
262-290-5210

Rough week for Clearwire takes toll on stock price



Shareholder Time Warner Cable bails, while analyst warns of liquidity crisis
September 18, 2012 | By Fred Donovan


It's been a rough week for wireless broadband provider Clearwire, and it's only Wednesday.
First, Clearwire, which provides retail and wholesale mobile and fixed wireless broadband services, was slammed by Morgan Stanley analyst Simon Flannery, who warned that the company could face liquidity problems next year.

Second, it came to light this week that Time Warner Cable, a major shareholder, plans to sell off its 46.4 million shares of  the company. Time Warner Cable, it seems, has decided to go with Verizon (NYSE: VZ) Wireless as its wireless services supplier, according to a report by Bloomberg.
The double whammy drove down Clearwire's stock price by 10 percent on Tuesday. The stock has dropped 31 percent so far this year.

The company, whose biggest shareholder and largest wholesale customer is Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S), has been struggling financially for some time, despite having 11 million U.S. subscribers that use its WiMAX network, as of January 2012. The company has $4.2 billion in debt, its revenues are declining and it continues to post net losses.

Flannery expects Clearwire to burn through $1.3 billion in free cash next year, with just $42 million in the bank at the end of 2013, according to a report by Forbes magazine.
"We continue to believe that various forces will drive top line pressure to the wholesale segment, as well as retail, driving liquidity challenges in 2013. We believe funding will once again come under pressure in the second half of next year as Clearwire launches LTE," Flannery was quoted by Bloomberg as saying.
The one bright spot for Clearwire was a wholesale 4G agreement it signed with EarthLink last week. Using the wholesale capacity, EarthLink will initially target broadband wireless consumers for in-home use. Future product offerings will include mobile devices and new services for small business customers.

lkconsulting.net

262-290-5210

With Cloud Hosting and Colocation services, customers can focus on their growth, not their infrastructures


What is the right solution for you
Private Cloud. Implement a secure, redundant, and scalable virtualized computing solution on your own dedicated hardware with built-in failover.
Enterprise Cloud. Implement a full virtualized and secure environment with high-availability, dedicated resource pools, a high-performance infrastructure powered by VMware vCloud Datacenter.
Hybrid Cloud. Provision virtual servers and physical servers on the same network for scalable network storage.
Colocation. Reduce capital and operational expenses by housing mission-critical data and business applications in a secure state-of-the-art data center.

L K Consulting offers a no cost or commitment analysis of your communications network services. We will recommend a solution that makes sense or there is no obligation to further utilize our services. We represent the largest companies in communications, at&t, CenturyLink, Verizon, Windstream to name a few. In total we represent more than 50 companies in this industry. Our concept is clear; we will do the analytic diagnosis and allow the carriers to align their services with your needs. Ultimately you will have the best in the communications industry working to enhance productivity and reduce cost with a single point of contact.

What needs to happen for us to move forward with the initial discussion?


Steven A. Kirchner L K Consulting, LLC EVP of Marketing and Sales Development
Lkconsulting.net
262-290-5210

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

AT&T Office@Hand


Description: https://www.e-access.att.com/abgmas_n/imail/upload/c_3460/TEMPLATE_RESOURCES/spacer.gif
Office@Hand unites all your wireless and fixed-line phones under one number—and since it’s cloud-based, you can be up and running with features like auto receptionist, multiple extensions, call-routing, on-hold music and more— in just minutes.
ENHANCE YOUR COMPANY IMAGE. Unite all your employees under a single number and convey a more professional phone presence with features that go beyond an on-site PBX solution.
IMPROVE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. Make it easy for customers to reach employees in your business—even when they’re not in the office.
DRIVE MOBILE PRODUCTIVITY. Employees can be where they’re needed, when they need to be there—since they’re accessible and not tethered to their premised based phone system through the same extension.
MANAGE ON THE FLY. Set up and manage your system from any computer with an Internet connection—or manage it right from your iPhone®, select BlackBerry®, or select Android™.
EXTEND YOUR BUSINESS HOURS. Route calls to a landline during the day and a mobile phone after hours, so your business can remain open—even if no one is there.
SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS. Save money with low fixed-monthly fees. And since it uses your existing equipment and phone lines, there are no complex installations, hardware investments or technical skills or other resources required.


For more information, please contact me directly,

Steven A. Kirchner 

EVP Sales and Marketing
L K Consulting
skirchner@lkconsulting.net
262-290-5210

   






Study: companies still falling short on big data goals Read more: Study: companies still falling short on big data goals

FierceBigData
September 18, 2012 | By Ariella Brown


A recently conducted CompTIA study has indicated that many companies still fall far short of their big data goals. It's based on two online surveys: one involving 400 American IT and business executives who are in charge of the systems relating to their companies' data, and the other 435 executives at IT firms who are only somewhat involved in those areas.
Both surveys were limited to U.S. companies and conducted in July 2012.
"As expected for an emerging technology with an evolving definition, many executives are still moving along the big data learning curve," Tim Herbert, CompTIA vice president of research,observed.

53 percent of those surveyed said they intend to devote resources to enhancing "the skills of current employees," while 32 percent said they would be looking into outside hires to get people with the skills they seek.
Additionally, 28 percent said they foresee entering into contracts with outside consultants "for services ranging from cloud storage integration, data center management or predictive analytics application deployment."
Currently, only about one in five businesses say they have a big data initiative in progress, though 36 percent say they intend to launch one within the next year. Some obstacles to pushing through big data projects include data silos that interfere with holistic views of data, and a lack of understanding of unstructured data.


IT, business have different views on data

FierceBigData
September 18, 2012 | By Ariella Brown

While businesses have a lot in common when it comes to attitudes about big data, there is a lack of common ground between the IT and business teams, according to a Harvard Business Review survey. While its survey is not yet fully analyzed, it considers it ripe enough to identify three primary "takeaways."
  • "First, the people we surveyed have high hopes for what they can get out of advanced analytics."
  • "Second, it's early days for most of them. They don't yet have the capabilities they need to exploit Big Data."
  • "Third, there are disconnects in the survey results--hints that the people inside individual organizations aren't aligned on some key issues."
The first two are consistent with some other studies, including a recent one from CompTIA. However, the third highlights something some other surveys don't: the fact that not all decision makers within an organization are on the same page with respect to big data plans. The disparity is due to the different perspectives of the business and IT end of the organizations.
Some examples include:
  • "How would you rate the access to relevant, accurate and timely data in your company today? World-class or more than adequate--IT 13 percent, Business 27 percent."
  • "How would you rate the analytic capabilities in your company today? World class--IT 13 percent, Business 0 percent."
  • "How would you rate your company on leaders' ability to use data and analytics to improve or transform the business? Less than adequate--IT 57 percent, Business 18 percent."
A "proximity bias" may account for IT reflecting a rosier view of their ability to handle analytics, and for business teams ranking their own ability to "to transform the business higher than their IT colleagues." However, they believe that another factor is that the IT knows more about the silos that keep the data from being effectively integrated in their organization, and thus are somewhat more realistic in their estimation of the odds of a big data transformation.  

FCC lifts restrictions on cable/CLEC mergers, acquisitions

FierceTelecom
September 17, 2012 | By Sean Buckley

The Federal Communications Commission on Monday paved the way for cable operators to purchase CLECs to expand their business service footprints by granting forbearance from Section 652(b) of the Communications Act.
By granting limited forbearance from Section 652(b) of the Communications Act, the FCC said it would "harmonize the rules that apply to transactions between competitive LECs and cable operators regardless of which entity acquires the other."
Section 652(b) prevented a cable operator from acquiring more than a 10 percent stake in local exchange carriers that provide service in their franchised areas unless all impacted local franchising authorities agree to a waiver of the provision.
Since section 652(a) only applies to acquisitions by LECs that were providing telephone exchange service as of January 1, 1993, the FCC said that the "definition effectively excludes acquisitions by most or all competitive LECs, as they were not providing such service by that date."
In its order, the FCC said that "mergers between cable operators and competitive LECs, both of which usually are non-dominant providers of telecommunications services, potentially serve many pro-competitive goals and appear consistent with the purpose and history of section 652. Streamlining the regulatory approval process for such transactions--without eliminating the important safeguards of the Commission's review of such mergers--can enhance facilities-based competition and spur technological innovation and investment that will benefit consumers."
Rumors of the FCC ruling to grant forbearance on 652(a) emerged last week in a Stifel Nicolaus report indicating that the FCC would approve the NCTA's request for forbearance request from Section 652. However, individual states and the FCC would still state regulators would examine deals to see if they are in the public interest.
This ruling follows a petition that the National Telecommunications & Cable Association (NTCA) made last August with the FCC that said CLECs and cable operators should not be subject to the Telecom Act's cross-ownership prohibitions.
The Broadband Coalition, a competitive telecom industry group, hailed the FCC ruling.  
"Everyone wins when there is more competition in the marketplace," said Chip Pickering, a former U.S. Congressman and spokesman for The Broadband Coalition, in a statement. "This decision today strengthens the position of broadband providers to compete with ILEC services. When competition thrives in the broadband marketplace, innovations occur benefiting businesses of all sizes. This is true for new innovations such as cloud technology."
While cable operators haven't been as aggressive on the M&A side as some of the traditional ILECs, Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA) and Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) have made a few notable deals in recent years to enhance their business services presence.
Comcast, while still a relative newcomer in the business services arena, enhanced its ability to target larger businesses by purchasing both acquiring both Cimco and NGT Telecom. Coupled with their own aggressive build out of fiber facilities and Ethernet, the Cimco acquisition immediately gave it an entree into the medium-sized business market, while NGT Telecom acquisition gave it enhanced VoIP services.
No less compelling was Time Warner Cable's acquisition of NaviSite, a provider of enterprise-class hosting, managed application, messaging and cloud services.
Cable operators may lack the pull of a large telco, but one of the things they do have is an aggressive spirit and a lack of legacy services that, for example, telcos must cannibalize when they earn a new Ethernet customer.

lkconsulting.net

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Analyst: A Sprint/MetroPCS merger more likely than one with T-Mobile

FierceWirelessSeptember 12, 2012 | By Phil Goldstein


A deal between Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) and flat-rate player MetroPCS (NYSE:PCS) makes much more sense than one between Sprint and No. 4 carrier T-Mobile USA, according to a Goldman Sachs analyst.
In a research report, Goldman Sachs analyst Jason Armstrong noted that Sprint's rising stock price has increased speculation that the carrier will engage in some kind of M&A activity. He said a deal for a smaller, regional carrier would be much easier to pull off than a deal with T-Mobile, which he called "aspirational" rather than likely. He wrote Cricket provider Leap Wireless (NASDAQ:LEAP) could also be a potential Sprint target.
A Sprint merger with MetroPCS or Leap would be less technically complicated than one with T-Mobile, since T-Mobile's network is based on GSM and HSPA+ technology and MetroPCS and Leap are CDMA carriers like Sprint. Still, the smaller carriers' AWS spectrum would need to be rationalized with Sprint's network. A deal for MetroPCS was reportedly close to being finalized earlier this year but was killed by Sprint's board; Sprint has never confirmed or discussed any of the reports about the MetroPCS deal.
"A smaller prepaid-centric deal may be the more logical route for now if Sprint determines to pursue M&A," Armstrong wrote. Sprint declined to comment, according to Bloomberg. 
Sprint's stock has climbed 114 percent in 2012 and was trading at slightly over $5 per share this morning. The carrier has produced stronger subscriber results in recent quarters.
Sprint has left the door open for consolidation. "We're certainly working very hard to compete with AT&T and Verizon," Sprint CEO Dan Hesse said in August. "The industry has to deal with the issue of the duopoly. The gap between the No. 2 and No. 3 players is enormous. We always have been and always will be open to further consolidation, as long as it isn't AT&T or Verizon Wireless."
In a recent interview with FierceWireless, MetroPCS COO Tom Keys said that the time is ripe for some kind of industry consolidation. 
"It would probably be a better time to do it now than any other time you can think of in the recent past," he said. "Now, how, who, why, where and what--that's going to be up for debate. But at the end of the day, I think what you've seen with the AT&T/T-Mobile deal is that there's at least two companies that thought that consolidation was a good thing. So if you take that as a precursor, yes--[but] under the desire that we always a provide a good experience for the consumer and the consumer doesn't get harmed by having artificially higher rates because you have one less competitor." 





What are the top 3 challenges you face in sourcing, procuring and tracking telecom?



Negotiating multiple contracts
Having the right technical skills in house
Managing multiple carriers
Lack of unbiased sources of information
Coordinating installations with multiple carriers
Managing the test and turn-up process
Limited visibility into technical details on services
Lack of experience in sourcing telecom
Insufficient or no tracking tool for inventory
Insufficient or no resources to manage

L K Consulting has the experience, knowledge, and ability to handle all of these for you at no expense. See why our customers choose us to manage their challenges when determining their provider(s) for network access, cloud applications, and mobility. 

lkconsulting.net

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

GoDaddy moves its DNS servers to VeriSign following major outage Read more: GoDaddy moves its DNS servers to VeriSign following major outage - FierceTelecom

September 11, 2012 | By Sean Buckley


GoDaddy is moving its Domain Name Service control into the care of VeriSign, the website hosting provider announced Monday, after suffering a major DNS server outage that took scores of websites offline yesterday.
Although VeriSign is a GoDaddy competitor that sells domain registration services, it provides protection services to prevent distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks.
The website hosting provider, which hosts 5 million websites mostly for small businesses, said that an outage began at around 1:25 p.m. EDT Monday.  It did not reveal what caused the outage.
"We are experiencing intermittent outages. This is impacting our site and some customers' sites," GoDaddy said in a note sent to customers Monday. "The issue started shortly after 10am PDT."
Once services were restored to most of its customers at 5:43 p.m. EDT, GoDaddy said it essentially handed VeriSign the keys to make their servers GoDaddy's servers.
Neither GoDaddy nor VeriSign would comment on their new relationship.
GoDaddy isn't the only service provider to face a DDoS attack. Last month, AT&T reported a DDoS attack on its DNS servers, resulting in service disruptions for a number of its enterprise customers.
And from the looks of it, GoDaddy and AT&T are not likely to be the only victims of a major DDoS attack. Rob Fleischman, CTO of Xerocole and a noted expert on DNS, told FierceTelecom in a previous interview that all carriers are at risk.


Monday, September 10, 2012

Google: 180 Kansas City neighborhoods qualify for Fiber TV service

FierceCable
September 10, 2012 | By Steve Donohue


Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) said Sunday that 180 of 202 neighborhoods in the Kansas City area have met preregistration requirements needed to receive its Google Fiber TV service when it launches next year.

The company--which plans to charge $120 monthly for cable programming, a DVR with 2 terabytes of storage capacity and a high-speed Internet connection offering speeds up to 1 gigabit per second--said it will finalize the list of the first "fiberhoods" that will receive the product on Thursday.
"This number has blown us away--and it's not even the final tally," Google Access general manager Kevin Lo wrote in a blog post Sunday about the Google Fiber TV preregistrations.
Kansas City incumbent providers Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) and AT&T (NYSE: T) will face stiff competition when Google flips the switch on the Fiber TV and wideband Internet service. Google has said it will offer free Internet access (after a $300 construction fee) to homes in the Kansas City area at speeds offered by current providers.
Several neighborhoods the Kansas City area have already seen more than 30 percent of homes preregister for Google Fiber TV, which suggests that Time Warner Cable and AT&T could face significant subscriber churn in the area. Lo said that Google plans to conduct another registration rally next year for neighborhoods that haven't yet qualified to receive Google Fiber TV.
For more:


Wednesday, September 5, 2012

XO incorporates Ciena into its 100G metro, regional network plans - FierceTelecom

September 5, 2012 | By Sean Buckley


XO Communications on Wednesday fit another piece into its 100G network puzzle in place by naming Ciena (Nasdaq: CIEN) as another of its optical suppliers.
Having already deployed Ciena's 4200 platform throughout this network, the new platform will accommodate a number of legacy SONET and next-gen protocols such as Ethernet and Fibre Channel in addition to delivering managed wavelength services in 1G to 10G, 40G and 100G increments.
"What we're using Ciena initially for is 100G for metro DWDM systems," said Randy Nicklas, CTO of XO Communications. "We're a long time user of Ciena in this context building metro and regional networks in order to get greater capillarity off of our intercity network when we get to carrier hotels."
Although it plans to extend these new capabilities throughout its nationwide network over the next year, the service provider initially has begun offering services on this enhanced network in New York City to wholesale carrier customers, connecting key carrier hotels like 111 Eighth Avenue.
The first ring in New York City will include three nodes, including 60 Hudson Street, an important meet place for service providers in Manhattan.  
Nicklas said XO "anticipates further construction with 6500 systems in the New York metropolitan areas, including some New Jersey sites as well."
Although XO already has a number of Ciena's 4200 platforms already deployed throughout its network, Nicklas said that all new network builds will use the 6500 platform.
"Ciena is our lead metro DWDM vendor and has been for some time," he said. "We'll continue to operate the 4200 systems, but when it comes to new construction we're going with the 6500 platform, and in large part that's somewhat driven by its 100G capabilities."
As part of its drive to deliver services to enterprise customers, XO will also introduce the 6500 into its carrier managed services offering.
Upgrading its network to meet 100G capabilities has been an ongoing priority for XO's ambitious network plans.
The deployment of Ciena's 6500 platform, which follows its previous agreement with Nokia Siemens Networks for its intercity and long haul networks, is set on its metro and regional networks. Interestingly, its other main optical supplier was not included in either deployment, but that does not mean it's out of the running for future 100G deployments.


Read more: XO incorporates Ciena into its 100G metro, regional network plans - FierceTelecom http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/xo-incorporates-ciena-its-100g-metro-regional-network-plans/2012-09-05?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal#ixzz25cGdFMwj
Subscribe: http://www.fiercetelecom.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceTelecom-FierceTelecom

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

L K Consulting: Q2 roundup: ILECs wade through legacy-to-IP migrat...

L K Consulting: Q2 roundup: ILECs wade through legacy-to-IP migrat...: September 4, 2012 FierceTelecom With the Q2 2012 earnings season coming to an end,  FierceTelecom  has taken the time to size up the ...

Q2 roundup: ILECs wade through legacy-to-IP migration

September 4, 2012

FierceTelecom


With the Q2 2012 earnings season coming to an end, FierceTelecom has taken the time to size up the performance of the top incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs).
As seen in previous quarters, ILECs are finding ways to offset ongoing wireline voice loss by emphasizing the sales of IP-based business and consumer services, including broadband data, video and Ethernet. They are also expanding their respective Fiber to the Tower (FTTT) footprints to provide wireless backhaul services to wireless operators.
AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) both continued to find success in their next-gen consumer U-verse and FiOS video and high speed broadband service sets. During the quarter, AT&T added 155,000 new U-verse TV subscribers and 553,000 U-verse broadband subscribers, helping to offset the 96,000 DSL subscribers it lost. Verizon added 134,000 broadband customers and 120,000 FiOS TV subscribers.
Finally, CenturyLink (NYSE: CTL) reported that it added 18,000 broadband Internet customers, ending the quarter with a total of 5.76 million subscribers. It also expanded the number of Prism TV subscribers by 11 percent.
The top three ILECs' business services units were also notable. While inevitable declines in legacy Frame Relay and ATM drove down AT&T's overall business revenues 1.5 percent to $9.1 billion, it saw strategic business service revenues, including Ethernet, VPNs, hosting, IP conferencing and application services rise 13.5 percent over the same period a year ago. Similarly, Verizon reported that legacy business service revenue declines drove down Global Enterprise revenues 3.4 percent year-over-year to $3.8 billion in the quarter. However, Verizon's strategic services sales increased 4.4 percent.
CenturyLink also benefited from next-gen business sales, reporting gains in both its Enterprise Markets Group (EMG) -- Network Services and Enterprise Markets Group (EMG) -- Data Hosting Services units. Enterprise Market Group (EMG). Driven by higher than anticipated strategic services growth in Ethernet and MPLS, overall EMG total revenues rose 2 percent over Q2 2011 to $648 million. Operating revenues for EMG -- Data Hosting, which consists mainly of Savvis' operations, rose 6.5 percent to $277 million due to strong managed hosting (including cloud) and colocation services sales.
Outside of the big three, the Tier 2 ILECs, including Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), FairPoint (Nasdaq: FRP), and Hawaiian Telcom (Nasdaq: HCOM) all reported gains during the quarter.
Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN) reported that revenues and sales rose 50 percent, to $1.5 billion, up from $64.6 million in Q1 2012. Bolstered by its acquisition of PAETEC, Windstream's business service revenues rose 2 percent year-over-year, to $893 million.
Both FairPoint and Hawaiian Telcom showed progress with their respective business and broadband initiatives. FairPoint reported that Ethernet services contributed about $10.2 million of revenue in Q2 2012, up from $9 million in Q1 2012 and $2.6 million in Q2 2011. Broadband continued to be a hot seller for FairPoint as the ILEC reported that its subscriber base rose 5.1 percent sequentially.
Hawaiian Telcom reported that landline voice losses drove down revenue to $94.7 million, but it saw continued gains with its IPTV subscriber base, which now passes homes 50,149 homes. One of the interesting facts about the telco's IPTV service was that about 60 percent of its total video customers took a triple play bundle, while 86 percent have a double play bundle where the service is available. On the business services side, Hawaiian Telcom bolstered its prospects by signing a deal to acquire competitive business service provider Wavecom.
In the regional Tier 2 telco space, Consolidated Communications (Nasdaq: CNSL) completed its acquisition of SureWest Communications and reported revenues rose 0.4 percent to $93 million.
Please take a look at the Q1 2012 metrics in the chart below. You can also look at our report of all of the service providers here in Q2 2012, and don't forget to look at our reports from Q1 2012, our reports from fourth quarter 2011, third quarter 2011, and second quarter 2011.

Q2 2012 Roundup--Top ILECs
Carrier RevenueAccess Lines Q2Access Lines Q1Broadband AddsTotal Wireline BroadbandVideo AddsM&A
AT&T$31.6B36.8M37.8M553,000 U-verse, but lost 96,000 DSL16.1M155,000 U-verse TVSold stake in Yellow Pages to Cerberus
Verizon$28.6B23.3M23.7M134,000 net new FiOS8.8M120,000 new FiOS TVN/A
CenturyLink$4.61Bnarrowed landline losses to 6.1%14.4M18,0005.76MIncreased video subs by 11%Integrating Qwest, Embarq, Savvis assets
Frontier $1.26B5.07M5.16M5,4001.78M13,300 satellite TV; lost 7,000 FiOS video subsCompleted integration of Verizon assets
Windstream$1.5B3.12M3.15M 1.49MDeclined to 1.2M subscompleted PAETEC acquisition
FairPoint$243.5M995, 2971.01M2,302318,510Not reportedN/A
Cincinnati Bell$368M598,500608,6004,000 Fioptics HS Internet257,2004,000 Fioptics entertainmentFiled papers for Cyrus One IPO
TDS Telecom$1.3B (TDS Parent)360,100363,500900220,400700 IPTV subsAcquired Vital Support Systems
Hawaiian Telcom$94M402,735408,8832,77986,021Total of 6,354 subsAcquired Wavecom Solutions
Consolidated Communications$93M225,025226,1675,275113,5814,616 IPTVCompleted SureWest acquisition
Lumos Networks$50.8M147,202150,641 (RLEC & competitive connections)1,38435,974173N/A
HickoryTech$43.8M43,97349,62827419,364Lost 384 subsAcquired IdeaOne
Shenandoah$3.3M22,67022,838305 DSL12,505Total of 89,536 cable video subsN/A


Friday, August 31, 2012

Google Fiber could actually widen digital divide in Kansas City Read more: Google Fiber could actually widen digital divide in Kansas City

August 31, 2012 | By Jim Barthold


Some of the more broadband-disadvantaged neighborhoods in Kansas City have a very real chance of never becoming Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) "fiberhoods" for the same economic reasons that they're now on the wrong side of the digital divide.
With two weeks remaining for neighborhoods to sign up potential customers for the service, many neighborhoods—"chiefly the least prosperous pockets of the metro area," according to the Columbia Missourian—are behind the pace needed to hit the threshold of anticipated customer penetration to qualify for Google Fiber service, the newspaper reported Friday, noting, "that means many of the free connections Google agreed to make to public buildings, library branches and community centers won't happen."
Google told the newspaper it's not writing off any fiberhoods and is working to fix problems for apartment dwellers who might sign up for the service. Still, the very nature of the sign-up process—driven by logical and reasonable economic factors—could make it tough for Google to build into the areas and expect a fair rate of return on the investment.
Matters are further complicated for Google by local organizations which are helping consumers with the $10 pre-qualification fee. While helping boost pre-reg numbers, this effort also leaves Google wondering whether these customers will in the end pay $120 a month for Internet and TV service or $70 a month Internet or even $25 a month for 5 Mbps connections.
"We're thrilled that some local organizations want to encourage widespread Internet access by helping with the Google Fiber pre-registration process. That being said, people should only pre-register if they intend to get Google Fiber," company spokeswoman Jenna Wandres told the newspaper.
Google's dilemma—and the plight of the citizens trapped in neighborhoods without broadband service—is part and parcel with the entire "digital divide" argument. Incumbent providers like Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) and AT&T (NYSE: T) were franchised into their businesses with different service requirements. TWC still gives free Internet and TV service to more than 350 libraries, schools and other buildings in Kansas City in Missouri and Kansas, the newspaper said. AT&T U-verse, to a lesser extent, still reaches 400,000 homes in the market.
The problem for Google Fiber comes down to perception and the way the service was introduced. Google positioned itself as a new way for the masses to get ultra-broadband, but even a company with pockets that drag on the ground must financially justify the investment, so Google set a pre-registration requirement as a condition for fibering a neighborhood.
Nevertheless, some residents assumed that Google would offer its service free to schools and libraries throughout the two cities. The company's agreement with the governing bodies of both Kansas Cities required only 430 locations and the cities picked those spots, leaving other neighborhoods trying to win a pre-registration lottery that realistically favors the more affluent.
"I'm concerned that the digital divide will be exacerbated by the fact that you'll have extremely faster Internet in some neighborhoods while people in neighborhoods with fewer resources will be left even further behind," Christopher Barnickle, an assistant director at the Kansas City, Kan. Public Library told the newspaper.
His thoughts were echoed by school district spokesman David Smith who opined, "It is unimaginable to us to have that divide reopen."


Thursday, August 30, 2012

Optical transport equipment market declines 5%

August 30, 2012 | By Sean Buckley

Carriers in North America, EMEA spent less money on gear

 "The optical market contracted in the first half of 2012 due to lower spending in the mature markets of North America and EMEA,' he said. "The emerging regions of Asia Pacific and Latin America, however, did grow as service providers in the regions continued to expand network capacity."

While the North America and EMEA optical markets declined 12 and 16 percent, respectively, Asia Pacific and Latin America grew 7 and 11 percent.
Two of the growth drivers in the optical technology revenue mix were WDM and Packet Optical Transport Systems (P-OTS).

Driven by the service provider demand for 40G and 100G wavelengths, WDM equipment revenue rose 5 percent in the first half of 2012. Likewise, the adoption of POTS by carriers like Verizon and XO continued to rise and contributed to almost one-third of the optical market revenues during this period.
From a vendor perspective, Huawei has become the dominant optical player, capturing about 20 percent of the market in this period. Dell'Oro's ranking is in line with other analyst firms such as Infonetics, which said in its Optical Network Hardware vendor market share report that it saw similar seasonal gains by the Chinese vendor.


Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Windstream, LifeSize partner to boost video conferencing for enterprises Read more: Windstream, LifeSize partner to boost video conferencing for enterprises

August 28, 2012 | By Sean Buckley

Will bundle video with its data and IP-based voice services

Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN) on Monday added video conferencing to its enterprise services portfolio by establishing an agreement to offer LifeSize Communications' services to its business customer base.
The service provider will bundle LifeSize's HD video products with its IP network solutions, including Ethernet data, in addition to its suite of VoIP, SIP trunking and MPLS services.
While videoconferencing is still a nascent yet growing market segment, partnering with LifeSize enables Windstream to offer the service on a broader scale than it would have on its own.
Instead, Windstream can immediately offer HD video services immediately to both its lower-end T1 data and higher-end Ethernet customers throughout its fiber network footprint.
Another option for Windstream is that could also offer video service on a cloud basis from one of its data centers, a market it has been expanding into via strategic acquisitions including its purchase of Hosted Solutions.  
Offering videoconferencing via a partner that has that expertise is a positive move for Windstream. But it still faces the challenge of educating more of its business customers on the value of such a product. It also comes at a time when the worldwide enterprise videoconferencing and telepresence market declined 6.9 percent in Q2 2012 to $564 million from the same period a year ago, according to a new IDC report.
Petr Jirovsky, Worldwide Networking Trackers senior research analyst for IDC, acknowledges that while the Q2 slowdown is a concern, adoption continues to grow.
"Despite the overall weak 2Q12 performance in the worldwide enterprise videoconferencing market, we still see adoption being driven by video integrations with vendors' UC and collaboration portfolios, and with the increasing use of video among small workgroup, desktop, and mobile users," he said.
Regardless of the near-term market challenges, it's obvious that Windstream has added videoconferencing through the partnership with LifeSize as a way to diversify its business services portfolio to more effectively compete with a host of smaller CLEC competitors as well as the big three ILECs AT&T (NYSE: T), CenturyLink (NYSE: CTL) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ).


Read more: Windstream, LifeSize partner to boost video conferencing for enterprises - FierceTelecom http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/windstream-lifesize-partner-boost-video-conferencing-enterprises/2012-08-28?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal#ixzz24rXrqdt3
Subscribe: http://www.fiercetelecom.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceTelecom-FierceTelecom

Verizon works to restore fire-damaged network in Lawrence, Mass. Read more: Verizon works to restore fire-damaged network in Lawrence, Mass.

August 27, 2012 | By Sean Buckley


Verizon (NYSE: VZ) on Monday began work on restoring services in the Lawrence, Mass. area following a fire under the Central Bridge on North Canal Street that caused damage to a number of the telco's area cables.
Many of the telco's customers in surrounding towns and cities located northwest of Boston, including Andover, Lawrence, Littleton, Methuen, North Andover, North Reading and Tewksbury, have also lost some services due to the fire. In addition, some business and government customers' voice and data services may be affected.
Since the fire took place early Monday morning, the service provider's crews have been splicing new cables, informing state and local officials, and have rerouted emergency lines for the local fire and police stations.

The service provider said it has set up trailers at the location of the fire with crews working "in round-the-clock shifts until all services are restored."

Verizon said it will provide another update on the restoration effort in Lawrence on Tuesday, Aug. 28.
In an update given to the media this morning (Aug. 28), Verizon said that while the work to restore service is complex because technicians are splicing thousands of individual copper and fiber optic connections, the restoration effort is on track.  
"Verizon crews worked through the night and made very good progress on restoring service for our customers," said Allison Cole, Verizon president of operations in New England. "We have already restored critical network operational and surveillance circuits, high-capacity fiber backbone circuits, and worked with state and local officials to ensure that all 911 services are fully operational in the area."
Last week, the service provider's network suffered an outage outside Baltimore when a derailed train damaged the telco's facilities at the accident site, interrupting some customers' voice and data services.